PPM Essentials Portlet: Project Status Reports Summary Attribute Name and Label should be consistent to specifically say 'Project Manager' instead of simply 'Manager'. Having the label of 'Manager' only in the portlet may be misleading to some end-users since there are different types of managers.
Also, the attribute in the NSQL statement of 'project_manager' represents the internal record id and it should be renamed as well for clarification. When the Clarity administrator is looking at the 'project_manager' attribute it seems as if this attribute should show the name of the project manager. This adds to the confusion of the end-users between 'project_manager' attribute and 'manager_name' attribute.
Steps to Reproduce:
Expected: Labels should be clear and consistent throughout the application.
Actual: Labels are vague and misleading.
The Clarity administrator can modify the portlet labels so that end-users won't be confused:
This issue has been documented as CCPEA-85 and is assigned to development for review. If you are experiencing this problem and the workaround above does not significantly help, please contact CA Clarity Technical Support.
Keywords: CLARITYKB, CCPEA-85, odmd.qry.prjStatusReport, studio, nsql, add-in