I have 4 master/proxy groups here. Two production master/proxy group in the production plex and 2 in the test plex. All master/proxies in all groups have the following RSVLOGIC statememt:
RSVLOGIC ENQ QNAME(CYBERRSV) RNAME(CYBERRSV)
Recently we have started having issues with ESP locking up (100% enqueue on CYBERRSV). I just want to confirm that what I am thinking is correct:
1 - Need to use a unique qname for each of my master/proxy groups - as a note: each of my groups does have it's own queue dataset.
2 - Need to add to MIM inclusion table. And we should specify SCOPE=SYSTEMS in MIM.
CA WA ESP Edition 11.4 Z/OS
The behavior change is related to PTF RO72017, which will make ESP master have about %80 of the share of cycle, so that Master can process more requests. But you have 4 masters, so this can cause resource constraint at times. Without this fix, the MINHOLD/MINDORM/MAXDORM in ESPPARM will be used to calculate the share, and by default, Master uses about %50 of the share.
2. Yes, no need to specify SCOPE=SYSTEMS in MIM.