This article provides a consolidated repository of frequently asked questions (FAQs), architectural details, and operational guidance for the Security Services Platform (SSP) and its features.
It addresses common queries encountered during deployment, lifecycle management, storage planning, and component troubleshooting to assist administrators in maintaining a healthy security platform environment.
Security Services Platform (SSP)
Yes. The backup and restore (B&R) process does not have a hard dependency on the underlying datastore. For example, if you back up an instance on Datastore A, uninstall it, and reinstall it on Datastore B, the restore will work.
Workflow Steps:
Prepare the environment: Deploy the SSP on an NFS datastore, onboard the NSX Manager, and configure the SFTP server for Backup and Restore.
Note: To deploy on an NFS datastore, add the NFS datastore, create a Datastore Tag-Category pair, apply the tag to the NFS datastore, and create a Tag-based Storage Policy in vCenter.
Take a backup: Perform a manual backup of the current SSP instance.
Tear down: Offboard the NSX Manager and delete the existing SSP instance.
Deploy the new instance: Deploy a fresh SSP instance using the exact same build version via the SSP Installer (SSP-I) onto a vSAN datastore.
Note: Complete the onboarding of the same NSX site immediately, as the UI requires onboarding before allowing navigation to other pages.
Target the backup repository: Configure the exact same SFTP server and directory path utilized in Step 1.
Fetch backups: Navigate to the Backup and Restore page on the SSP UI and click Restore to retrieve historical backup states.
Restore: Select the desired backup point and execute the restore operation.
Note: This same logic applies when migrating to a new Storage Policy.
For a detailed breakdown of the exact configuration components saved during a backup, please refer to the official documentation:
⚠️ Important: Security Services Platform (SSP) backup and restore operations are not supported on the Evaluation deployment type.
Yes. Customizing the LDAP configuration to utilize Global Catalog port 3269 (or 3268 for non-SSL) is fully supported.
The platform currently allows you to configure only one identity source at a time. Multi-provider LDAP environments are not supported. For more details, see the official documentation:
If you encounter errors such as Failed to create sftp client or sftp: problem parsing server host public key: ssh: no key found, it is because only Linux-based SFTP servers are supported on the version SSP 5.0 and certified as target repositories for SSP backups. Windows Server host key parsing is available from the version SSP 5.1 onwards.
Yes, this topology is supported. For specific deployment prerequisites and configurations, review the following guide:
Yes. Multiple distinct SSP instances can coexist and be managed within a single vCenter Server instance.
No. Setting the site-name during the onboarding of the NSX Manager is a one-time immutable operation.
The site-name is tightly coupled with internal configuration schemas, database structures, clusters, and backup schedules throughout the NSX ecosystem. Changing it post-deployment introduces structural mismatches that can lead to configuration corruption or service failures. Renaming requires a full uninstallation and reinstallation of the platform.
If the SSP-I OVA was deployed without selecting the "Enable SSH" checkbox during the vSphere OVF deployment wizard, you can manually enable it via the CLI:
Open the VM Web Console via vCenter.
Log in using your root credentials.
Run the following command:
systemctl start ssh
(Optional) To ensure it persists across restarts, run:
systemctl enable ssh
This is expected behavior when one or more internal Kubernetes worker nodes drift into a NotReady state. When the UI cannot resolve node health, it fails to evaluate the form factor deployment type.
Resolution: Investigate the health of the underlying nodes by checking the MachineHealthCheck (MHC) components. Refer to the High Availability documentation for recovery procedures:
Node Recreation Behavior: Yes, this is by design. The vCenter certificate thumbprint is statically embedded within the node template specifications defined inside the SSP Installer (SSPI). When a vCenter certificate rotates, a thumbprint mismatch occurs. Reconnecting the SSPI to vCenter triggers a template regeneration process, which purposefully decommissions old nodes and provisions new ones with the updated thumbprint to ensure cryptographic integrity.
Timeout / Grace Period: The vsphere-csi driver does not feature an automated grace period or timeout handling for certificate mismatches. The moment a mismatch occurs, CSI pods immediately fail initialization and will trigger a CrashLoopBackOff (CLBO). Node regeneration must be manually and explicitly initiated to restore cluster storage communication.
These events are standard operations. The SSP runs an upstream Kubernetes cluster that uses the native vSphere Container Storage Interface (CSI) driver to manage lifecycle volumes.
Reason for Occurrence: When application pods utilizing a PersistentVolumeClaim (PVC) are scaled, restarted, rescheduled, or undergo rolling updates, the Kubernetes control plane constantly requests vCenter to dynamically map, move, detach, or reattach backend storage objects to the respective active worker nodes.
Is this a concern? No. This represents expected CSI-driven lifecycle behavior within a healthy Kubernetes-on-vSphere environment and does not signify errors or service degradation. No administrative action is required.
Minimum Storage represents the baseline capacity required to satisfy initial pre-deployment validation checks.
Recommended (Maximum) Storage accounts for future system scale-out operations.
As the platform scales, storage consumption grows across two primary layers:
VM Local Storage: Scale-out adds additional nodes to the cluster, with each virtual machine requiring an allocation of 200 GB of local storage.
Persistent Volume (PV) Storage: Increasing application replica counts naturally drives higher utilization across backend Persistent Volumes (PVCs).
ℹ️ Note: The Content Library footprint (~50 GB) and the system Reservation Buffer (~200 GB) remain completely static and do not expand during scale-out operations.
Yes, that interpretation is correct. The Content Library resides on the vCenter server and requires approximately 50 GB. Each control plane and worker node requires 200 GB of local storage.
The exact breakdowns across different deployment scales are detailed below:
Advanced Deployment (Standard 7-Node Setup)
Local VM Storage: 1,400 GB (7 nodes × 200 GB per node)
Reserved Buffer: 200 GB (Reserved for future system overhead)
Content Library: 50 GB
Total Capacity Required: 1,650 GB
Large Advanced Deployment (Full 13-Node Scale-Out)
Local VM Storage: 2,600 GB (13 nodes × 200 GB per node)
Reserved Buffer: 200 GB
Content Library: 50 GB
Total Capacity Required: 2,850 GB
Persistent Volume (PV) Storage Overhead In addition to the VM base storage listed above, separate datastore capacity must be provisioned for Kubernetes Persistent Volumes:
Initial/Minimum PV Allocation: 1,600 GB
Maximum Potential PV Allocation: 3,000 GB
Full Scale-Out Target: At maximum operational capacity (13 nodes combined with maximum PV utilization), the total environment footprint requires:
2,850 GB (VM + Base Storage) + 3,000 GB (Max PV Capacity) = 5,850 GB
The Content Library hosts the primary golden ISO/OVA images required to provision and scale cluster worker nodes.
Its primary purpose is to centralize, standardize, and streamline lifecycle operations, ensuring that any newly added worker nodes are built from an identical, validated installation source.
Yes, malware detection and prevention will continue to function in a "headless" mode via the deployed host-level Service VMs (SVMs), but with specific operational limitations:
Local Enforcement: The SVMs will successfully block or delete known malicious files on guest VMs using their locally cached threat signatures (ASDS cache).
UI Visibility Loss: Because the central platform MPS pods are offline, any detection or prevention actions taken by the SVMs cannot be transmitted or logged. Consequently, these events will not appear in the NSX/SSP User Interface.
Verdict Registration Failure: If new or unknown files are encountered, they may still undergo deep backend or cloud analysis, but their finalized threat verdicts cannot be synchronized or registered within the local MPS system until the pods are fully restored.
Yes, modifying the name of the Service VM directly within vCenter is safe to perform and will not impact active operations. However, please note that this change is temporary; any future lifecycle operations, such as redeployments or appliance upgrades, will automatically revert the VM back to the default product naming convention.
This is standard vSphere behavior triggered when active snapshots are running on a VMFS datastore. vCenter calculates the total Provisioned Space using the following breakdown:
Base Virtual Disk: 80 GB
Maximum Potential Snapshot Growth (Delta limit): 80 GB
Swap File Overhead: ~0.08 GB
Total Reported Provisioned Space: ~160.08 GB
The actual physical storage consumption remains safe (typically around 80–85 GB including the snapshot delta). Once the active snapshots are deleted or consolidated, the provisioned storage reporting in vCenter will return to the expected 80 GB display.
No. SSP-NDR is an event-driven correlation engine that operates strictly on high-fidelity security events generated by its native integrated detectors: IDPS (Intrusion Detection/Prevention), NTA (Network Traffic Analysis), and Malware Prevention.
Raw network flow ingestion via IPFIX is handled by the NSX Intelligence component rather than NDR. Currently, IPFIX telemetry collection is limited exclusively to NSX Transport Nodes exporting distributed firewall (DFW) traffic data. Direct IPFIX ingestion from external, third-party physical switches or routers is not supported.
Currently, no. SSP-NDR is purpose-built and tightly coupled with the vDefend/NSX software-defined networking layer, which limits native interoperability with external ecosystem platforms.
There is currently no native EDR integration framework available in the platform. Expanded third-party security ecosystem integrations and cross-platform threat correlation are under consideration for future product roadmaps.