There are occasional delays that occur, during busy times, up to 90 seconds for OPSREQ requests. Normally, the requests are handled instantaneously (less than a hundredth of a second).
02:11:34.9849 JOBID1 OPS0997T *-* 57: "opsreq" CICS_RULE JOB
02:11:34.9860 JOBID2 OPS0997T *-* 57: "opsreq" CICS_RULE JOB
02:11:34.9865 JOBID3 OPS0997T *-* 57: "opsreq" CICS_RULE JOB
02:11:36.1779 JOBID4 OPS0997T *-* 57: "opsreq" CICS_RULE JOB
02:12:01.7123 OPSSxxxx OPS3092H opsreq ruleid JOBID1
02:12:01.7253 OPSSxxxx OPS3092H opsreq ruleid JOBID2
02:12:01.7511 OPSSxxxx OPS3092H opsreq ruleid JOBID3
02:12:01.7634 OPSSxxxx OPS3092H opsreq ruleid JOBID4
When this happens it is a cluster of requests and then suddenly they run all at once.
In this case the OPSLOG showed that there were 20 OSF servers defined and all were busy processing the EXEC calls from the same rule.
The options to resolve this are to examine the EXEC calls to see if they can be combined to run in the same server or to use TSP (priority servers) to schedule work that needs to run immediately.
If assistance is needed to correct, open a support case and provide a tersed copy of the archived OPSLOG, along with any involved rules.