in Identity Governance what are the columns "Status" and "Action Type" in the Certified Resources With Violations Highlighted Report describing, they seem to be conflicting:
Certification Name | Resource Name 2 | Application Name | Resource Name 3 Application | Resource Name 1 Permission | Person ID | User Name | Approver Person ID | Approver Name | Approver Email | Status | Comment Text | Violations | Is Pre Approved | Action Time | Action Type |
Cert_123 | Group | APP_01 | APP_01 | Permission_01 | UserID | Name | AppID | Mgr Name | Mgr Email | APPROVED | Yes | 8/2/24 10:57 AM | REJECT | ||
Cert_123 | Group | APP_02 | APP_02 | Permission_02 | UserID | Name | AppID | Mgr Name | Mgr Email | APPROVED | Yes | 8/2/24 10:57 AM | REJECT | ||
Cert_123 | Group | APP_03 | APP_03 | Permission_03 | UserID | Name | AppID | Mgr Name | Mgr Email | APPROVED | Yes | 8/2/24 10:57 AM | REJECT | ||
Cert_123 | Group | APP_03 | APP_03 | Permission_03 | UserID | Name | AppID | Mgr Name | Mgr Email | APPROVED | Yes | 8/2/24 10:57 AM | REJECT |
Identity Governance 14.x
The Action Type is the 'Audit card' behavior, for example if the Violation is set to 'forbidden to have Resource Name 1 and Resource Name 2'
the Action Type is set to 'REJECT'
If a manager overrides this and approves those permissions, then the STATUS column will reflect that approval and show "APPROVED" in the "Certified Resources With Violations Highlighted" Report