This article covers the main topics to be aware of when migrating Gen 8.6 COBOL applications to .NET (C#).
There is no real "batch" mode for a .NET server application, specifically there is no analogy to z/OS JES which takes a queued job and begins executing it.
This related article covers an alternative mechanism: How to generate/run a Gen .NET application in batch
For a block mode application with screens, an extra step is needed to first convert the UI to a client UI for the move either to a "Fat" client or to a "Thin" client + server (Distributed Processing) architecture - see above "Client/server applications" section.
There is a "Transform Screen Design into Window" feature in the Navigation Diagram which can convert the screen for an individual Procedure Step to a Window.
For example the Gen sample model online/block mode Business System CORPORATE_MANAGEMENT.
In Navigation Diagram, use Diagram/Open Window and click on a Procedure Step which does not have a window e.g. MENU, to make the Transform button active and clicking it will show the "Transform Screen Design into Window" option enabled.
If no windows exist at all in the Business System then after using Diagram/Open Window the Transform button will be immediately active and clicking it will show the option "Transform Existing Business System" enabled. See Using the Toolset > Transformation Type Dialog
The next step would be to divide the existing Procedure Step code up to separate what can go into the client (no database access) and the server (database access).
There is not a one-to-one match between the z/OS User Exits and the .NET User Exits, but there are common types of exits. For example, some of the z/OS user exits are provided to implement security customizations. Likewise, some of the .NET user exits are provided to implement security customizations.
Consider what z/OS user exits have been customized and for what purpose. Then determine if similar customizations will be needed in the .NET environment.
If using a Host Encyclopedia (HE) it can only generate COBOL and unless using partner product GuardIEn that enables remote code generation on the HE (can generate code for non-z/OS platforms including C#), then generation would need to be done on the Workstation Toolset or on a Client/Server Encyclopedia (CSE). The latter would provide centralised C# code generation, like a HE does for COBOL now.