Endevor/DB 0897 Abend

Products

• IDMS

Issue/Introduction

An IDMSDDDL step that updates APPLDICT with the DLODPROT member in CAGJSRC is failing with *+ E DC601997  CA-ENDEVOR/DB SPECIAL ERROR STATUS CODE 0897.

The DBNAME entry in the DBTABLE for APPLDICT is correct in that it includes the CCDB segment and is defined with INCLUDE SUBSCHEMA IDMSNWKA MAPS TO NDVRNWKA

CREATE

DBTABLE DBNAME1

    INCLUDE SUBSCHEMA IDMSNWK? MAPS TO IDMSNWK? DBNAME APPLDICT

    INCLUDE SUBSCHEMA IDMSCAT? MAPS TO IDMSCAT? DBNAME APPLDICT

    INCLUDE SUBSCHEMA USVSUB0? MAPS TO USVSUB0? DBNAME DBX

    INCLUDE SUBSCHEMA XDMSUB00 MAPS TO XDMSUB00 DBNAME DMA

    INCLUDE SUBSCHEMA USDSUB00 MAPS TO USDSUB00 DBNAME DMLO

    INCLUDE SUBSCHEMA ESXSUB00 MAPS TO ESXSUB00 DBNAME ENFORCER

    INCLUDE SUBSCHEMA SSKSUB00 MAPS TO SSKSUB00 DBNAME MASTRKEY

    INCLUDE SUBSCHEMA ESSSUB00 MAPS TO ESSSUB00 DBNAME SPG

    ;

CREATE

DBNAME DBNAME1.APPLDICT

    MATCH ON SUBSCHEMA OPTIONAL

    MIXED PAGE GROUP BINDS NOT ALLOWED

    FOR GENERAL USE

    INCLUDE SEGMENT APPLDICT

    INCLUDE SEGMENT CCDB

    INCLUDE SEGMENT SYSMSG

    INCLUDE SEGMENT SYSSQL

    INCLUDE SUBSCHEMA IDMSNWKA MAPS TO NDVRNWKA

    ;

I have modified this DBTABLE in various ways, trying to make it similar to that which all of our CVs use, but everything I’ve tried yields the same results.

The NDVRCNFG configuration table is also not being used.

 

Environment

Release : 19.0

Component : Endevor/DB for CA IDMS

Resolution

 

Tried to recreate by hooking APPLDICT.  Found DICTNAME= not necessary, being the default dictionary.  And, batch will initialize a CCDB without a CV being brought up, even though the documentation says the online system should be used to seed the CCDB.  All was working nicely.   

Started walking code in NDVRSDBN.  Turns out, there's an attempt to open a SYSIDMS DD.  In this case, the customer is using a SYSIDMS load module. Created the load module, took SYSIDMS out of the JCL and got '*+ E DC601997  CA-ENDEVOR/DB SPECIAL ERROR STATUS CODE 0897'.

So, they  should run the job with SYSIDMS DD in the JCL.  

Please try coding SYSIDMS DD and the JCL.