MOI ISPF Disk Assignment option EXPOSE command failed to expose newly added disk volumes for a MOI zLinux Appliance
search cancel

MOI ISPF Disk Assignment option EXPOSE command failed to expose newly added disk volumes for a MOI zLinux Appliance

book

Article ID: 236292

calendar_today

Updated On:

Products

Mainframe Operational Intelligence

Issue/Introduction

Problems exposing disks to MOI zLinux LPAR.

The UCB's for the new disks we are trying to use are:

BX24-BX2F

BZ70-BZ83

When trying to expose the disk from z/OS ISPF panel using the EXPOSE primary command, I issued the cmd `EXPOSE BX24` and got no error message. 

But BX24 didn’t appear in the list after cmd returned.

We’ve rebooted the MOI zLinux LPAR and tried again but still not able to expose the new disks. lscss and lsdasd command outputs on the MOI appliance also shows no sign of the newly added disks.

 

 

 

Environment

Release : 2.0  

Component : MF OPERATIONAL INTELLIGENCE   

This information only applies to a zLinux s390x installation.  

Resolution

After you initially IPL your
MOI appliance
, you must bring online the disks that are needed for installation. After you bring the disks online, you reboot the appliance to finish the installation. After the appliance has installed, you can verify the status.  The issue that is covered in this Knowledge Document is that the EXPOSE command that makes the disks available to format and add to LVM's did not expose the list of available disks.   Here is the process as documented in the MOI Technical Documentation to attempt to EXPOSE the newly added disks: 
  • From the main MOI Installation panel,
  • Select 2 - Manage
  • Select your MOI appliance host from the displayed list
  • Select
    3 - Disk Health
     
    From the filesys panel, select the
    lvm0 
    entry: 
     
    (s390x Only) Enter the
     EXPOSE 
    command and enter the disk range of disks that you want to use for the appliance, such as
    0.0.0202-0.0.0207
    . Then, press Enter.
     
    The issue that cause this Case issue behavior was that only the four digit disk volume name was entered when the EXPOSE was attempted i.e. BX24    versus    0.0.BX24    .   The range of disks to be exposed should actually have been entered to make the EXPOSE much quicker i.e.  0.0.BX24 - 0.0.BX2F    and     0.0.BZ70- 0.0.BZ83
     
    Note that no edit is in place for the disks names and no error message was displayed to warn the Customer that there was a naming issue.