The CA90s for MSP(Fujitsu) version does not work the LMP check correctly with the CAS9125E when using the LMP key of the expiration date year 2031.
The portion of the JOBLOG:
SYSGC020 17.32.47 STC 1071 CAS9075I - SERVICE(CA-RIM/BASE ) VERS(V1.0) GENLVL(0010S9100) SERVICE LEVEL(B3)
SYSGC020 17.32.47 STC 1071 CAS9115I - INPUT: PROD(U5) DATE(31MAR31) CPU(XXXX-xx/nnnnnn) LMPCODE(********
SYSGC020 17.32.47 STC 1071 CAS9125E - INVALID DATA: KEY TAMPERING DETECTED OR TRANSCRIPTION ERROR
SYSGC020 17.32.47 STC 1071 CAS9115I - INPUT: PROD(6F) DATE(31MAR31) CPU(XXXX-xx/nnnnnn) LMPCODE(********
SYSGC020 17.32.47 STC 1071 CAS9125E - INVALID DATA: KEY TAMPERING DETECTED OR TRANSCRIPTION ERROR
SYSGC020 17.32.47 STC 1071 CAS9115I - INPUT: PROD(5F) DATE(31MAR31) CPU(XXXX-xx/nnnnnn) LMPCODE(********
SYSGC020 17.32.47 STC 1071 CAS9125E - INVALID DATA: KEY TAMPERING DETECTED OR TRANSCRIPTION ERROR
SYSGC020 17.32.47 STC 1071 CAS9115I - INPUT: PROD(7E) DATE(31MAR31) CPU(XXXX-xx/nnnnnn) LMPCODE(********
SYSGC020 17.32.47 STC 1071 CAS9125E - INVALID DATA: KEY TAMPERING DETECTED OR TRANSCRIPTION ERROR
Note:
Product name:CA90s 1.0 genlevel 0010
Release : 1.0
Component : CA Resource Initialization Manager(Comm)
OS:MSP(Fujitsu) and VOS3(Hitachi)
The problem is that both the Hitachi and Fujitsu code contained the original CA90S code for validating keys and the expiration dates which was limited to 35 years from the base date of 1990.
Therefore, the both CA90s(VOS3 and MSP) rejected a valid LMP key after of year 2025.