Large volume of SMF 255 records written by Sysview
search cancel

Large volume of SMF 255 records written by Sysview


Article ID: 192844


Updated On:




A large volume of SMF type 255 records was being written by Sysview. 

We then took dump of Sysview and restart it, but the issue did not stop.
We then suspect a CICS region that kept writing CICSLOGR in loop state, and the issue stopped after we cancelled the CICS region.

We want to know if there is any command in Sysview that we can use to identify who are writing large volume of SMF type 255 records when the problem occurs. 


Release : 16.0

Component : SYSVIEW


I think the terminology that is being used is very misleading. The "flood" of SMF records being created by SYSVIEW appear to be the CICS transaction detail records. SMF 255 subtype 27. A transaction detail record is created each time a CICS transaction ends. SYSVIEW does not create additional transaction records. The number of records is driven by the number of transactions executed.

When a transaction is created, there are multiple destinations for the record including SYSVIEW log streams and SMF.

SYSVIEW configuration options are currently set to write transaction records to SMF. I am assuming that this is the desired outcome. It is not the default. There is nothing wrong with writing SYSVIEW transaction records to SMF as along as they will be used and are expected.

The email showing several transactions PSM6 running in CICS jobname CICSJ5 were ALL started from a single transaction XSMQ task number 247 in region A75CJ5.

From the information provided, I cannot fully understand the program logic, but transaction XSMQ 247 in region A75CJ5 is making requests that start the PSM6 transaction in region CICSJ5. If this a form of MQ function shipping?

In any case, it appears that the PSM6 transaction in CICSJ5 is abending. Whether transaction PSM6 abends or not, it is a transaction that will end and SYSVIEW will create a transaction detail record for each.

As a note, if CICS SMF 110,1 records are active, CICS will be creating the same number of SMF records as SYSVIEW.

They will match.

Some additional things could be happening that could produce more SMF records.

If transaction end threshold processing is active and threshold exception definitions exist, then additional exception record could be getting created. Multiple exception records could be created for each transaction. Since the transaction abends, an ABEND exception record could be created.

AN ABENDS threshold definition exists out of the box. If more thresholds exist, additional records could and would get created if matching occurs. The writting of SMF records can be controlled in the threshold definition itself. Each threshold has a SMF| NOSMF attribute. This can be seen on the CTHRESH command display.

Each CICS region connects to SYSVIEW logger. The logger ultimately controls whether the records get written to SMF. The options are specified in the parmlib member CICSLOGR.


The command CICSLOGR can be used to see current settings for the logger as well as the number of records processed.

These are all items and reasons that SYSVIEW will create and write an SMF record for the transactions that are executed. CICS is generating the work. SYSVIEW is responding accordingly as it should.

The CICS transactions may be behaving poorly causing additional transactions to be executed and therefore additional SMF records including additional exceptions records.

You as a user are in full control of the amount data that SYSVIEW generates and the destination where the data is logged or written.

The current settings should be examined to determine if they are set as desired. If not, make changes.

I believe the reasons for the abending transactions should also be examined. They are causing addition work on the system.