Should TSSCICSN Be Linked To Instead Of TSSCICS Since TSSCICSN Is Linked AMODE 31?

book

Article ID: 17675

calendar_today

Updated On:

Products

CA Cleanup CA Datacom - DB CA Datacom CA Datacom - AD CA Datacom - Server CA CIS CA Common Services for z/OS CA 90s Services CA Database Management Solutions for DB2 for z/OS CA Common Product Services Component CA Common Services CA Datacom/AD CA ecoMeter Server Component FOC CA Easytrieve Report Generator for Common Services CA Infocai Maintenance CA IPC Unicenter CA-JCLCheck Common Component CA Mainframe VM Product Manager CA Chorus Software Manager CA On Demand Portal CA Service Desk Manager - Unified Self Service CA PAM Client for Linux for zSeries CA Mainframe Connector for Linux on System z CA Graphical Management Interface CA Web Administrator for Top Secret CA CA- Xpertware CA Top Secret CA Top Secret - LDAP CA Top Secret - VSE

Issue/Introduction

Description:

We have a program which uses the Application Interface, linking to program TSSCICS. This program is called via the CICS mirror transaction (CSMI). In CICS TS version 4.2, CSMI is defined with DATALOC(BELOW). In CICS TS version 5.1, it is defined with DATALOC(ANY), so we got an AEZC abend because TSSCICS is linked as AMODE 24.

Should it link to TSSCICSN instead since TSSCICSN is linked as AMODE31.

Solution:

TSSCICS is a stub and will go to TSSCICSN automatically.

If you wish, you can link to TSSCICSN directly.

Environment

Release:
Component: AWAGNT