Should TSSCICSN Be Linked To Instead Of TSSCICS Since TSSCICSN Is Linked AMODE 31?

book

Article ID: 17675

calendar_today

Updated On:

Products

Cleanup Datacom DATACOM - AD CIS COMMON SERVICES FOR Z/OS 90S SERVICES DATABASE MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS FOR DB2 FOR Z/OS COMMON PRODUCT SERVICES COMPONENT Common Services CA ECOMETER SERVER COMPONENT FOC EASYTRIEVE REPORT GENERATOR FOR COMMON SERVICES INFOCAI MAINTENANCE IPC UNICENTER JCLCHECK COMMON COMPONENT Mainframe VM Product Manager CHORUS SOFTWARE MANAGER CA ON DEMAND PORTAL CA Service Desk Manager - Unified Self Service PAM CLIENT FOR LINUX ON MAINFRAME MAINFRAME CONNECTOR FOR LINUX ON MAINFRAME GRAPHICAL MANAGEMENT INTERFACE WEB ADMINISTRATOR FOR TOP SECRET Xpertware Top Secret Top Secret - LDAP Top Secret - VSE

Issue/Introduction

Description:

We have a program which uses the Application Interface, linking to program TSSCICS. This program is called via the CICS mirror transaction (CSMI). In CICS TS version 4.2, CSMI is defined with DATALOC(BELOW). In CICS TS version 5.1, it is defined with DATALOC(ANY), so we got an AEZC abend because TSSCICS is linked as AMODE 24.

Should it link to TSSCICSN instead since TSSCICSN is linked as AMODE31.

Solution:

TSSCICS is a stub and will go to TSSCICSN automatically.

If you wish, you can link to TSSCICSN directly.

Environment

Release:
Component: AWAGNT